With Roe Gone, Republicans Quarrel Over How Far To Push Abortion Bans

Attempts to enact a restrictive abortion ban in Indiana have shown divisions among conservatives on how to legislate in the wake of Roe v. Wade I-N-D-A-N-O-P-L-S โ€” In the wake of the Roe v. Wade decision, opponents of abortion thought that a fresh wave of limitations would be quickly passed, particularly in conservative states.

Republican legislators have a commanding majority in many state legislatures, but so far they have done next to nothing.
The reason for this is being debated this week in the state of Indiana.

The majority of Republican lawmakers agree that abortion access must be limited, but they disagree on the appropriate level of regulation. It begs the question, “Should there be a complete ban?” If that’s the case, then sexual assault and incest should be exempt. Moreover, what happens if a pregnant woman’s life is in danger but medical professionals do not think she will pass away?

Indiana Republican State Senator Rodric Bray, whose caucus has long campaigned to limit abortions, is split on a plan that would ban abortion with few exceptions, acknowledged that all of them were difficult problems. Mr. Bray claims that legislators had not “spent enough time on those concerns” prior to the Roe v. Wade decision being overturned this year. However, we have arrived, and we acknowledge that this is a challenging endeavor.

Read More:

All around the country, people are having the same discussions. Republicans debating the issue today are not governing in the abstract, unlike conservative states that imposed trigger limits on abortion when it was still a federal right. During this election season, abortion has emerged as a divisive subject, and candidates on both sides of the aisle are grappling with complex considerations concerning exceptions, subtle divisions within their own party, and divergent public opinion.

The recent high-profile incidents, such as a ten-year-old Ohio victim of sexual assault who had to travel to Indiana to seek an abortion due to new restrictions in her home state, have highlighted the importance of the issue at hand.
Most Republican-controlled state governments appear to be waiting things out. After a court stopped to implementation of an abortion ban in 1849, West Virginia lawmakers adopted a nearly comprehensive prohibition this week.

But in Nebraska, where a trigger ban was almost passed earlier this year but fell just short, Governor Pete Ricketts has talked about calling a special session but has not done so as of yet. As governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis has mostly sidestepped questions about whether he would act swiftly to enact new limits.

South Dakota’s Governor Kristi Noem has reneged on her campaign promise to convene lawmakers in the State Capitol to debate more abortion legislation, despite the state having enacted a ban following the Roe v. Wade decision. Furthermore, Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds has stated her administration’s primary priority is on having previously blocked regulations finally enforced by the courts.

With Roe Gone, Republicans Quarrel Over How Far To Push Abortion Bans
With Roe Gone, Republicans Quarrel Over How Far To Push Abortion Bans

Republican Senator Debbie Reynolds told local media last month, “Right now it wouldn’t do any benefit to calling a special session.”It seems like a ban on abortion should have been quite easy to pass in Indiana. In recent years, legislators have imposed severe limits on abortion. Both houses of the legislature are controlled by Republican majorities. As Roe was overturned, Republican Governor Eric Holcomb, who was previously Mike Pence’s lieutenant governor, called on lawmakers to examine further restrictions.

However, in reality, there has been much disagreement when trying to convince Republicans to agree on a bill. The start of the extraordinary session, which had been scheduled for the beginning of July, has been delayed until this week. Some Republican lawmakers had already expressed discontent with the party’s strategy before the meeting. And when some Republicans proposed a ban on abortion with a few exceptions, it failed to satisfy anyone. The ACLU of Indiana called it a “cruel, deadly law,” and Indiana Right to Life called it “weak and disturbing.”

In testimony before lawmakers this week, Indiana Right to Life representative Jodi Smith said, “This particular measure, maybe the best analogy I can offer is Swiss cheese – there are so many holes.” Smith also mentioned that numerous Senate Republicans had sought that group’s endorsement.

Although it is possible that the bill’s language would change, as it stands, it would make abortion illegal unless the mother’s life was in danger or she submitted an affidavit early in her pregnancy claiming she was a victim of rape or incest.
There was not a single proponent of the bill during the two days of public testimony. On Tuesday, it was put to a vote in a Senate committee and narrowly passed, with one Republican and all Democrats voting against it and several Republicans who voted in favor expressing major misgivings.

Senator Ed Charbonneau, who voted yes, stated, “I guess my desire is that we make a bad measure less horrible.” Even though he voted to advance the bill, Senator Eric Bassler remarked, “There are numerous reasons not to support this law on many different levels,” suggesting he would oppose it in the full Senate. The bill’s sponsor, Senator Sue Glick, said that she was “not quite” pleased with the legislation when it was brought to the Senate floor for a likely vote on Friday.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Scroll to Top